Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 15401

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : UD01 - UD03 Full Version

Acute Unilateral Parotid Gland Swelling following General Anaesthesia for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Case Report


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64165.18523
Saiesh Narayan Raut Dessai, Sanjot Ninave, Amol Bele

1. Junior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Saiesh Narayan Raut Dessai,
H. No. 71, Annapurna Niwas, Assolda, Chandor-403714, Goa, India.
E-mail: saieshrautdessai4321@gmail.com

Abstract

Acute enlargement of the parotid gland following general anaesthetic administration is an uncommon, harmless, and self-limiting complication. The most likely cause was thought to be anaesthesia mumps, which involves a complex interaction of multiple factors, including factors such as direct trauma, patient position leading to altered salivary flow along with an increase in viscosity due to dehydration, its occurrence following arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anaesthesia is relatively rare. It is usually a self-limiting disease and requires only follow-up observation, and in a few case reports, evaluation with imaging studies has been performed. However, severe complications may sometimes occur. If upper airway obstruction develops as in the present case, then emergency airway management must also be considered. Several surgical subspecialties, including orthopaedics, obstetrics and gynaecology, neurology, and spinal surgery, have recognised this uncommon postoperative syndrome. The present case report describes the medical condition of a 50-year-old female patient who experienced postoperative parotitis and underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery for rotator cuff repair involving general anaesthesia.

Keywords

Anaesthesia mumps, Parotitis, Salivary gland, Sialadenitis

Case Report

A 50-year-old female presented with a chief complaint of recurring shoulder injury, who required arthroscopic assisted Hill Sachs repair under general anaesthesia. She had no medical history of co-morbidities, habits, or allergies. The patient’s preoperative anaesthesia examination revealed a blood pressure of 160/100 mmHg and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 rating, with normal airway examination, full temporomandibular and neck movement, and a Mallampati grade II. The patient’s Electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed a regular sinus rhythm, and the chest x-ray was unremarkable. To manage her blood pressure, the patient was prescribed a 5 mg daily dose of amlodipine and was instructed to take it on the day of the procedure with sips of water. The patient was kept nil per oral overnight and given maintenance intravenous fluids.

In the operating theatre, an 18-gauge cannula was inserted, and standard anaesthesia monitoring was established. The patient received premedication with 0.2 mg i.v. of glycopyrrolate and 0.02 mg/kg of midazolam. The patient was induced with propofol and vecuronium. After mask ventilation for three minutes, the patient was intubated with a 7.5 mm id endotracheal tube and was kept under mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg of predicted weight with a respiratory rate of 16/minute. Fifteen minutes after induction patient was positioned in the lateral decubitus position (left) with a semi-soft ring pillow. Sevoflurane was used to maintain anaesthesia at a Minimum Alveolar Concentration (MAC) of 0.8%, with 1.5 L/minute oxygen and 1.5 L/minute air (50%). A muscle relaxant was administered intermittently. Intraoperative blood pressure was maintained around 140/80 mmHg with a pulse of 72 beats/minute. Crystalloids were used for fluid replacement. She received 2.6 L (crystalloids). Urine output was monitored at 0.5-1 mL/kg during the four hour procedure, with a blood loss of around 40 mL. The irrigation fluid pump pressure and flow rate were standardised in the normal recommended range of 40-80 mmHg and 50-150 mL/minute. The patient was then made supine, reversed with 0.05 mg/kg of myopyrrolate, and extubated.

After the surgery, the patient experienced painless swelling on the left jaw in front of the ear which was noticed immediately after repositioning the patient to supine (Table/Fig 1). However, the patirent did not have any trouble with swallowing, and her vital signs remained stable. On examination, a firm, globular mass was palpated in the left gland but there was no erythema or tenderness (Table/Fig 2). The patient had a full range of motion when opening her mouth and denied any previous symptoms of decreased salivation or dry mouth. After being transferred to the postoperative observation room, there were no signs of fever or elevated white blood cell count. The swelling improved significantly after the patient received 100 mg hydrocortisone, rehydration therapy with ringer lactate at the rate of 80 mL/hour. It gradually subsided after 72 hours (Table/Fig 3). The patient was discharged after five days without any complications.

Discussion

Anaesthesia mumps, also known as postoperative parotitis, is a rare complication of general anaesthesia that causes acute swelling of the salivary glands, particularly the parotid glands. It is a common and transient occurrence that typically occurs within two weeks after surgery. The incidence of anaesthesia mumps following endotracheal anaesthesia was reported to be five in 3000 cases (1). The typical manifestation of this condition is painless swelling of the parotid gland on one side, which usually resolves within a few days (2). This uncommon postoperative syndrome has been identified not only in orthopaedics, obstetrics and gynaecology, neurology, and spinal surgery, but also in several other surgical subspecialties (3),(4).

In 1878, Munde was the first to describe acute postoperative sialadenitis after oophorectomy surgery (5). The parotid gland is more susceptible to inflammation compared to other salivary glands due to its anatomical features, such as the buccal orifice and lack of mucin secretion (6). During anaesthesia, the use of neuromuscular relaxants, along with straining and/or coughing, can cause air to flow backward into the parotid gland, leading to inflammation and swelling (3),(7),(8). Increased airway pressure combined with muscle relaxation can result in air entering the parotid orifice and obstructing the excretory ducts, causing pneumoparotid (4),(9). Relaxation of muscle tone around Stensen’s duct opening can cause venous congestion and obstructive acute transitory sialadenopathy may occur due to compression pressure blocking the Stenson’s duct during lengthy procedures in the lateral decubitus position (8). Dehydration before surgery can lead to thick secretion and obstruction of the salivary duct. Parasympathetic stimulation following pharyngeal activation can cause vasodilation and hypeaemia, exacerbating swelling (8),(10). The patient’s condition was unlikely to have been caused by an adverse drug reaction as there were no signs of fever, skin rash, or eosinophilia, and none of the medications known to cause drug-induced sialadenitis were given (11),(12),(13). Anaesthesia mumps has also been observed in a patient who underwent a ceasarean section under spinal anaesthesia (5). A study conducted to observe the effect of irrigation fluid in shoulder surgery found a significant increase in the patient’s neck, chest, midarm, and midthigh circumference, indicating regional and systemic absorption of irrigation fluid. However, this change in anthropometric measures was insufficient to impair the airways or respiratory system (14). Periglandular tissue oedema that compromised the upper airway lumen was observed in a case 2of craniotomy (9). It was speculated that the instrumentation used during surgery could trigger a strong reflex arc, resulting in gland hypeaemia. Morbidly obese patients with short, thick necks are at risk of ischaemic sialadenitis due to vessel compression and compromised perfusion (8),(9),(15). Vascular compression, whether arterial or venous, can lead to the development of ischaemic sialadenitis. The clinical presentation of ischaemia-related sialadenitis often includes painful unilateral swelling and red haemorrhagic patches. To prevent this complication, adequate padding of the face and stabilisation of the neck should be ensured (8),(16). Various imaging techniques, such as ultrasonography, sialography, Computed Tomography (CT), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), have been used to diagnose the condition. Ultrasonography can confirm the presence of subcutaneous emphysema by identifying multiple bright areas within the affected side. CT appears to be the most effective imaging modality for detecting even small amounts of air within the parotid gland (8). Bacterial infection can be ruled out through cultures and procalcitonin level assessment (9). Treatment for this condition may include sufficient hydration and the use of anti-inflammatory drugs such as Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) or corticosteroids (17).

Conclusion

While there is no specific treatment for anaesthesia mumps, preventive measures such as pre-surgery hydration and proper patient positioning can help prevent and mitigate the risk of this complication. It is important for anesthesiologists to recognise that this condition is temporary and benign. They should be informed about its nature, which can even occur after local anaesthesia, and be prepared for emergencies that may require prompt action to secure the airway. Rehydration therapy using crystalloids like Ringer’s lactate and appropriate airway management appear to be the most effective care for this condition, although further research is needed to confirm this conclusion.

References

1.
Asghar A, Karam K, Rashid S. A case of anaesthesia mumps after sacral laminectomy under general anaesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015;9(3):332-33. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ece C, Uzgur P. Case report: Postoperative parotitis and review of the literature. Journal of Emergency Medicine Case Reports [Internet]. 2020;11(3):88-89 [cited 2022 Nov 27]; Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.33706/jemcr.782379. [crossref]
3.
Kwon SY, Kang YJ, Seo KH, Kim Y. Acute unilateral anaesthesia mumps after hysteroscopic surgery under general anaesthesia: A case report. Korean J Anaesthesiol. 2015;68(3):300-303. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Liu YH, Pu TW, Yu HW, Kang JC, Hsiao CW, Chen CY. Anaesthesia mumps after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy under general anaesthesia: A case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2021;80:105632. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Maher AH, Anfal S, Mahmoud M, Maab M, Ahmad T, Ababca FZ, et al. Anaesthesia mumps: a case report. Int J Clin Anaesth Res. 2023;7(1):06-07. [crossref]
6.
Ugga L, Ravanelli M, Pallottino AA, Farina D, Leone C. Diagnostic work-up in obstructive and inflammatory salivary gland disorders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2017;37(2):83-93. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Kumar KP, Kumar PK, Jagadesh G. Acute sialadenitis of parotid gland: Anaesthesia mumps. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(1):97-98. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Postaci A, Aytac I, Oztekin C, Dikmen B. Acute unilateral parotid gland swelling after lateral decubitus position under general anaesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012;6(3):295-97. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Cavaliere F, Conti G, Annetta MG, Greco A, Cina A, Proietti R. Massive facial edema and airway obstruction secondary to acute postoperative sialadenitis or ‘anaesthesia mumps’: A case report. J Med Case Reports. 2009;3(1):7073. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Mandel L, Surattanont F. Bilateral parotid swelling: A review. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2002;93(3):221-37. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Power KN, Flaatten H, Gilhus NE, Engelsen BA. Propofol treatment in adult refractory status epilepticus. Mortality risk and outcome. Epilepsy Research. 2011;94(1-2):53-60. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Mauz PS, Mörike K, Kaiserling E, Brosch S. Valproic acid-associated sialadenosis of the parotid and submandibular glands: Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2005;125(4):386-91. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Kenningham J. An unusual case of postoperative facial swelling: Correspondence. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(6):601-02. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Gupta S, Manjuladevi M, Vasudeva Upadhyaya K, Kutappa A, Amaravathi R, Arpana J, et al. Effects of irrigation fluid in shoulder arthroscopy. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(3):194-98.[crossref][PubMed]
15.
Chidipothu K, Verma NC, Madavi S, Jadhav JA. Acute bilateral swelling of the parotid gland after general anaesthesia in lateral decubitus position. Cureus. 14(9):e29154. [Internet]. 2022 Sep 14 [cited 2023 May 27]; Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/113305-acute-bilateral-swelling-of-the-parotid-gland-after-general-anaesthesia-in-lateral-decubitus-position. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Narang D, Trikha A, Chandralekha C. Anaesthesia mumps and morbid obesity. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2010;61(2):83-85.
17.
Montazeri N, Darabi MH, Hessami K, Shekouhi R, Sohooli M, Shamsi T, et al. A case of bilateral anaesthesia mumps after cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: A rare case and literature review. Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022;2022:5004358.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64165.18523

Date of Submission: Mar 26, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 02, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jun 06, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 27, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 24, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jun 02, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com